000 | 03530nam a2200253 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
999 |
_c427911 _d427911 |
||
003 | ISI Library, Kolkata | ||
005 | 20201211104448.0 | ||
008 | 201211b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
040 |
_aISI Library _bEnglish |
||
082 | 0 | 4 |
_223 _a338.0973 _bG146 |
100 | 1 |
_aGalbraith, John Kenneth _eauthor |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aThe New industrial state/ _cJohn Kenneth Galbraith |
260 |
_aCalcutta: _bOxford, _c1967 |
||
300 |
_axxiv, 423 pages, _c21.5 cm. |
||
504 | _aincludes index | ||
520 | _aIn it, Galbraith asserts that within the industrial sectors of modern capitalist societies, the traditional mechanism of supply and demand is supplanted by the planning of large corporations, using techniques such as advertising and, where necessary, vertical integration. The book followed Galbraith's 1966 series of BBC Reith Lectures – a series of six radio broadcasts, also titled The New Industrial State – in which he explored the economics of production and the effect large corporations could have over the state. Galbraith argues that this is made necessary by the long-term planning required for production processes involving advanced technology (and that these same technological challenges were answered with similar types of planning in Soviet societies) which involve substantial additional risk. One of the results of this is, according to Galbraith, that perfect competition as generally understood in classical economic theory is no longer a useful explanation of the industrial sector (although it is still useful in sectors of the economy that are still dominated by small firms). Galbraith argues that the "industrial system" – by which he means (in general terms) the companies which control around two-thirds of output in key sectors of the economy – are controlled in practice by a technostructure rather than shareholders; he claims that the technostructure does not act to maximise profit (as that involves the risk of failure) but principally to maintain the organisation and, as a secondary aim, to ensure its further expansion. He says that a key aim of the technostructure is to maintain its control over the company, and so it prefers financing via retained profits to bank borrowing; thus returns to shareholders are lowered to ensure the company does not risk its self-reliance. Furthermore, the companies of the industrial system facilitate a system of informal price fixing and price stability to ensure long-term planning is feasible. Galbraith also asserts that the traditional notions of risk most closely associated with small enterprise become less relevant to large industrial enterprises and conglomerates. Risk is diminished, Galbraith says, by advantages large enterprises have in securing longer-term supplier and labor contracts, and by the use of financial instruments such as commodity futures to mitigate volatility in raw materials prices. Political influence of large industrial concerns in governmental economic and labor policy is cited as another factor that tends to create the stable market conditions that are necessary for corporations' long-term planning of production. The New Industrial State covers much of the same ground as Galbraith's 1958 work, The Affluent Society, but substantially expands and extends those ideas. | ||
650 | 4 | _aIndustrial System | |
650 | 4 | _aCapitalist Society | |
650 | 4 | _aVertical Integration | |
650 | 4 | _aTechnostructure | |
650 | 4 | _aAggregate Demand | |
650 | 4 | _aIndustrial Planning | |
942 |
_2ddc _cBK |